(713) 364-4796

 

The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected an appeal concerning patent validity in a case involving the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and Return Mail Inc. This decision has significant implications for patent law and patent validity. By declining to reconsider a decision, the Court upheld a lower court’s ruling, which centered on the validity of a patent held by Return Mail Inc.

us postal service mailbox - usps logo stock pictures, royalty-free photos & images

 The Case Overview: USPS Patent Dispute

At the heart of the case is a patent dispute over a postal system invention. Earlier in 2011 a private company, Return Mail Inc., sued USPS over their patent rights to a process for undelivered mail. In 2022, federal claims court undermined the patent’s validity, arguing that the invention was not novel enough to warrant patent protection. This decision was upheld in February by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Ultimately Return Mail Inc. sought for The Supreme Court to review standards for patent eligibility and this request was denied this November.

Free USPS shipping supplies, including Priority Mail Flat Rate boxes and envelopes.

Photos: USPS

Implications for Patent Validity and Innovation

The Supreme Court’s decision to reject the appeal underscores the difficulty of overturning patent validity rulings. Also, t highlights the importance of ensuring inventions are sufficiently novel and non-obvious to receive patent protection. For innovators and businesses, this ruling serves as a reminder that patent challenges are a common part of the legal landscape. Above all, patent holders must be prepared to defend their intellectual property rigorously.

 An Ongoing Problem

This case is notable because it re-examines the question of patent eligibility. The high court last addressed patent eligibility in a 2014 ruling that helped establish a two-part eligibility test. The test requires courts to determine if an invention involves an unpatentable abstract idea, natural phenomenon or law of nature, and if so, whether it includes an inventive concept. Many believe this ruling and others contribute to confusion has led court to cancel patents that should be protected.

Want to learn more about filing your own patent application? Need assistance? Feel free to call or email us at (713) 364-4796 or admin@madan-law.com.